साँचा:स्रोतहीन/doc
 |
यह प्रलेखन उपपृष्ठ साँचा:स्रोतहीन के लिए है। इसमें उपयोग विधि की जानकारी, श्रेणियाँ और वह वस्तुएँ हैं जो कि असली साँचा के पृष्ठ पर नही हैं। |
 |
This template should only be used on articles that have no sources at all. Don't add this template to articles that contain even one general reference, parenthetical reference, or citation-containing footnote. A citation is any description of a reliable source that supports any of the article content. The format of the citation and the name of the section heading is not what determines whether a link or citation is a source. |
When to use
[सम्पादन]You may add this template only to articles that contain zero sources of any kind.
- Do not add this template
- In articles that have some citations, but not enough, the {{Refimprove}} template should be used instead as a general template, or the {{Unreferenced section}} template for specific unsourced sections.
- In articles containing a list of sources at the end, but no inline citations, including parenthetical references or in-text attributions, consider {{no footnotes}} when the article would be significantly improved by detailed attribution of sources to specific claims.
- Watch out for lists of general references that someone has incorrectly listed under ==External links==. If the link leads to a reliable source that supports some article content, then that website is a reference, not an external link.
- Other templates, listed below, should be used when the sources are inadequate for other reasons.
- Alternatives
- Be bold! Consider searching for references and adding them to the article, instead of this template.
- In articles about people and businesses, consider using the more specific
{{third-party sources}}template, to encourage citation of WP:Independent sources rather than the subject's own website. - See Wikipedia:Biographies of living people for guidance on dealing with unreferenced biographies of living people.
How to use
[सम्पादन]This template should not be substituted (subst:).
{{Unreferenced|date=दिसम्बर २०२४}}
There is one optional parameter:
- Date parameter
- The date parameter is (generally[१]) used to indicate when the template was added to a page. An example of its usage is
{{Unreferenced|date=दिसम्बर २०२४}}. Adding this parameter sorts the article into monthly subcategories of Category:Articles lacking sources, rather than adding it to Category:Articles lacking sources itself, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. If the date parameter is omitted, a bot will add it later.
सामान्य जानकारी
[सम्पादन]इस साँचा को लेख के शीर्ष पर रखा जा सकता है, लेख पृष्ठ के तल पर (एक खाली "संदर्भ" या "नोट्स" खंड में आम तौर पर पहले {{Reflist}}टेम्पलेट), या लेख की वार्ता पृष्ठ पर रख सकते है।
Categorization
[सम्पादन]This template adds articles to Category:Articles lacking sources, a hidden category.
Differences from related templates
[सम्पादन]The similar template {{Refimprove}} adds an article to Category:Articles needing additional references.
Short-cut
[सम्पादन]- {{Unref}}
See also
[सम्पादन]The following templates are useful in cases where there are some sources, but these are in some way inadequate or insufficient:
- {{BLP unsourced}} — Variant of this template for biographies of living people
- {{Unreferenced section}} — Variant of this template for a specific section
- {{Citation needed}} — For marking a particular claim as needing a source
- {{Refimprove}} — Has some sources, but would benefit from more
- {{Primary sources}} — Dependence on primary sources without reliable published interpretation
- {{Unreliable sources}} — Dependence on unreliable sources
- {{One source}} — Dependence on a single source
- Citation method and style
- {{Citation style}}
- {{No footnotes}} — to indicate article has references but not inline citations
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup
Footnotes
[सम्पादन]- ↑ Because of the nature of the workflow using the current date makes sense, it is simpler to add, especially for the WP:bots it means that older dated categories do not have to be constantly created and deleted, and it enables some measure of progress. moreover it is "good enough" to get the articles into the workflow and the intention is to ensure they are cleaned up eventually. Occasionally however it may be useful to bulk add items, to older categories, for example when the system was initially set up, when merging two schemes or when adding to the current month would swamp it disproportionately.